tempus fugit

Blijburg session

 

Musicaerial September 2 Lepelenburg Park, Utrecht

Musicaerial & Frouke Wiarda, framgents ‘tempus fugit ‘ Bart de Vrees    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cHBbNJOpbI

Christina Viola Oorebeek  

‘tempus fugit’ for solo percussion & electronic                                                          [:soundwheel: toy piano tines:kite string:hourglass:]

Percussion solo: Bart de Vrees

From August 20-30th, I had the opportunity to work at STEIM on a
new work for the project ‘Musicaerial’. Frouke Wiarda conceived and organized the project, which had its first performance as the pre-opening of the Gaudeamus Music Week 2012 on September 2 in Lepelenburg Park in Utrecht.

In the studio Bart and I experimented with the sections of the piece using the soundwheel I developed, toy piano tines and other small percussion instruments. The interaction with the kite was done by Bart plucking and playing on the amplified kite string. For that, we had sessions at Blijburg, the “new beach” in Amsterdam with Frouke as kite master, trying out live sampling with a portable amp/speaker unit.                                                                                                  The sound differed from session to session, as well as at the performance, as the kite strings need to be changed according to the velocity of the wind. At the performance, a relatively
thin one was used, which happily produced a crisp and well-defined pitch, mixed with wind. The live sampling and interaction with the kite could only be imagined and reconstructed in the studio through field recordings of the sessions.

Bart de Vrees, percussionist and composer, is great to work with. His performance at the Gaudeamus Week was stellar, his chops on the kite string were awesome and his input and feedback in the work process, inspiring. Reason to continue the collaboration!

Doing a piece in a fluid compositional form, with room for improvisation, in a park, meant trying to develop a strategy full of contingencies. There were many unpredictable elements:

_the weather, obviously                                                                                                                       _no rehearsal with the sound system                                                                                               _the varying sonorities of the kite string, and more.

I was using Max/Msp for the first time, an addition to Lisa and Junxion, which I have used intermittently in the last years in work with electronics. Throughout this new residency, Daniel Schorno, composer-performer and adivsor at STEIM,  provided excellent advice with the setup, as well as offering valuable feedback and new ideas in the artistic concept and realisation of “tempus fugit”. His broad experience and background in ‘classical’ and improvised music in the digital-and-or-acoustic worlds, plus his artist’s eye for imagery, which he so generously shares with colleagues, is a true treasure. I can only hope that he remains vitally connected with STEIM in future!

Also, I want to thank Max-mentor and valued colleague, Danny de Graan, composer-performer, for his help and for his valuable Max for Live meetings at STEIM.
And, of course, thanx to STEIM for the residency!

fragments of the work with Bart:                                                                                                         http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cHBbNJOpbI

T.A.G.C. rehearsals at STEIM Studio 3

3rd day of rehearsals for TAGC Audio visual piece based directly on the “TRACK 12″ short novel by Ballard, utilizing Microsonics and Micography to explore and interpret the original story. Commissioned for a live show at the J G Ballard Festival, Amsterdam Sat Sept 8th 2012.

Jan Klug, Instrument Lab #3

I remember a day in spring.

I sat on a bench at the Amstel near STEIM and noticed the pink wires coming out of the palm of my hand, running to a small device attached to its back, and felt that I’d probably have to try to not behave in an overly suspicious way.

Me and the device are harmless, I tried to communicate non-verbally to the numerous pedestrians and the curious police car.

We’re both just part of a hybrid instrument, consisting of some software, two of these wireless MiniBee controllers, and two theremins.

Those buttons at the other end of the pink wires – they snuggled so comfortably in the palm of my hand that I forgot about them when I went out of the dark STEIM studio.

* * *

The Instrument Lab #3 started with introductions to the rich history of STEIM by Jonathan Reus and Takuro Mizuta Lippit (including intriguing footage from the archives) and a tour through the building. This effectively set the tone for the week to come, and fired up the inspiration.

When we first presented our initial research ideas to the Steim staff and our fellow residents, I had the plan to develop a (possibly wireless) device which lets me apply and control effects on the sounds of my theremin, without having to remove my hands from the theremin antennas.

Packing the equipment for my trip to STEIM, I had felt sorry for my WiiMote, thinking “you’ll have to be disassembled, poor little thing”.

In the workshop of Frank Balde however, we discussed the disadvantages of bluetooth in a performance setup (though generally, the hacking of poor little devices was encouraged). This, and Marije Baalmans workshop on the Sense/Stage system, saved the WiiMote, but also rendered it superfluous for the time being.

The miniBee controllers of the Sense/Stage system are easily configurable and remarkably reliable – a seductive combination that made me employ two of these for my setup; one for each hand. Basically, they’re mini-Arduinos with Xbee radio communication and onboard accelerometers. This way, I could use the built-in bending- and turning possibilities of my hands to communicate something to the software, while the theremin was still able to concentrate on the distance of my hands from the pitch- and volume antennas.

Attaching the miniBees and their batteries at the back of my hands by means of some white rubber band (widely used to play jumping games on schoolyards) was far from elegant, but I had promised my hands to not force them into gloves while playing the theremin. The same rubber band however, in combination with some strategically applied gaffer tape, also allowed me to fix the three-button-contraption in the palm of my hand, so my fingers could click them without confusing the theremin.

 

The choice of the pink wire for connecting the buttons to the miniBees made the whole look like a medical device somebody had lost in a park, but unfortunately the extensive wire-and-button-boutique of STEIM was closed for the easter weekend, so I had to go with whatever was to be found in the box that me and Sam Andreae had quickly assembled while the lab was still open.

* * *

To give all the accelerometer- and button-data a meaningful purpose was like juggling with a couple of agitated pythons, but eventually I managed to map everything I needed through a patient max patch into my Max4Live device, whose main job it was to record the live input from my instruments (pataphone, sax, theremin-brothers) into a buffer and replay that in a controlled chaotic way, while applying some filters.

Not too much to ask, one could say.

* * *

After the easter weekend, the STEIM staff returned to check the progress of our projects. The evening of the same day also brought the Concept stage, where we were to present the outcome in a concert, so there was not much time to make big adjustments.

Still I found the comments by Kristina Andersen and Daniel Schorno very useful.

Daniel reminded me that I had to watch out for RSI-problems if I used buttons in the way I did, and suggested to use specific gestures to do the switching of parameters or even different modes of operation. And indeed, during the performance, I realized that my fingers, which were supposed to swiftly dance over the buttons to control recording and effects, were actually clinging to them like rugby players with a personality disorder.

Maybe that was because I didn’t have a chance yet to teach that part of my brain which extends into my fingers to do its new job (which dramatically differs from pressing saxophone keys), but I’ll definitely keep Daniels comments in mind.

And Kristina’s enthusiasm gave me the confidence that I actually could use this system for a performance, even though the software was still figuring out what it was meant to do and my skills for playing this new instrument were not even ordered yet by my consciousness.

playing the pataphone

* * *

Recapitulating this intensive week of STEIM Instrument Lab #3 of course also brings back memories of my fellow residents and their projects.

Sam Andraea, whose distortion-enhanced saxophone made me jealous for its charming wildness; Hasan Hujairi with his electronically expanded oud, who also played a nice duo with Luigi Pizzaleo and his amazing metal sculpture interface thing; Iris van der Ende with her beautiful harp sounds that even make the stars twinkle; Tim Thompson with his kinect-powered Space Palette instrument that transformed the audience into happily smiling performers.

And of course the STEIM staff, inhabiting this wonderful place and making the center of Amsterdam move counter-clockwise by boldly rowing against the stream of cultural decay.

I’d like to thank them all.

* * *

Ten years ago, I visited STEIM for the first time – for a research week with Italian director Andrea Paciotto. This residency dramatically changed the course of my life, as I learned about all the things for the first time that I now use on a daily basis, like Max/MSP, sensors, live video- and sound processing, Ableton Live and self-made pasta sauce.

Now, as if a loop with some transformation has been applied to my life, I will return to STEIM – and, to my pleasure, for a longer period.

During the Instrument Lab #3, I learned about the Instruments & Interfaces Master course that STEIM and the Institute of Sonology offer together.

The setup for the concert with Knalpot

After the Instrument Lab, I continued working on my setup, to prep it for using it during the theremin-festival at the Grand Theatre (another endangered species) where I partially played solo, partially improvised together with Knalpot – and the feeling crept over me that I didn’t want to let go, that I had to research further how to really use this interactive system, how to make it part of my setup for solo- and ensemble improvisations.

So I applied for the Instruments & Interfaces master course, and was accepted.

This week, I’ll start into this new phase of STEIM-influenced life.

Exciting times these are!

:)

www.janklug.com

Black Blogses

Not knowing how to start a first entry to a blog in either an accepted format or in a catchy way which is inviting to read on, I simply say; into the deep!

Roughly seven months have past; from hitting rock bottom at STEIM’s soundbunker with the presumed dead, legendarily obscure Black Box analogue modular system to washing up on the shores of the first floor with drawers full of knobs, pots and spare parts, making me drool like a kid in a toystore…
I faced broken modules, faulty power supplies, burning leads and loads of waves, from etherial and watery to solidly piercing or low frequent rumbling waves, in many a shape. Today choice and chance collide, giving me the opportunity and time to shed some light on the progress. And write.
I could start with a basic description of the system and the individual modules but I will not, simply because it is pretty elaborate to describe and hopefully I can manage to keep you interested if I don’t give it all away in this first post.

So for now, to start with, I just want to make the following three announcements;

1 – The Black Box modules have been fully recapped, enhancing the looks beyond any manmade definition of sexyness;
2 – New six-pin Painton leads were made to make optimum use of the three-way ‘main’ power supply;
3 – a custom eigth-way power supply module was finished today to make up for the lack of the 3rd, still non-functional, original cabinet, making it possible to use a total of 24 modules.

More news and info coming soon!

All the best,

Sybren Danz

Timeart Ensemble meets Dutch Improvisers

During january / february 2012 we took part in the artist exchange project “musickitchen” (http://www.musickitchen.eu) during which Anne La Berge, Sven Hahne, Robert van Heumen and Matthias Muche were meeting at STEIM for preparing an electroacoustical composition for a quite large ensemble, consisting of:

Timeart Ensemble
Michel Doneda: sopranosax (FR); Sven Hahne: laptop/video (DE); Matthias Muche: trombone (DE); Daniel Riegler: trombone (AT); Leo Riegler: laptop/turntables (AT); Joris Rühl: clarinet (FR), Benjamin Maumus: spatialization (FR)
&
Anne La Berge: flute/laptop (NL), Robert van Heumen: laptop & controllers (NL), Felicity Provan: trumpet (NL), Oscar Jan Hoogland: elektrisch clavinet/electronics (NL), Angel Faraldo: laptop (NL)

We developed a score taking into special account the possibilities of live-sampling and interaction between the instrumentalist and the laptop players. The piece was performed on february the 2nd at TROUW/de verdieping.

http://soundcloud.com/vanhuman/section-1-slow-air-subtle

http://soundcloud.com/vanhuman/section-4-motives-gestural

http://soundcloud.com/vanhuman/section-8-clusters-around-f

http://youtu.be/apnoN7NHB-U

Lauren Hayes > Haptics Development

In my previous visit to STEIM in 2010, I was just beginning my research into haptic interface design for the performance of live electronic music, and moreover, how this technology might influence the musical outcomes of a composition or improvisation. This has taken me in two directions. The first explores haptic interfaces (such as the Novint Falcon, discussed in the previous post) as a means of enhancing potential for expressiveness and articulation in live electronics. Writing on this is forthcoming, and a performance of work exploring this idea can be seen here.

The second approach has used vibrotactile feedback as a method for firstly receiving cues and other instructions from the laptop, and secondly, as a means of communicating with another performer, within an improvisational setting. The first method is described in detail here, and is demonstrated below in a performance of Kontroll, for prepared piano, self-playing snare and live electronics. As well as sending signals, vibrotactile feedback is used to provide a more embodied experience for the performer, creating the feedback loop that is often broken/missing in systems of digital music (see papers above for more details).

The second method was a joint project with Christos Michalakos, and is described in detail here, with a video of our NIME 2011 performance below.

I met with Marije Baalman at STEIM, with a view to developing the vibrotactile system in a wireless format, both to assist my own performances, as well as to work with larger ensembles. We quickly implemented a prototype using Marije’s Sense/Stage technology, which was relatively easy to set up (with Marije’s help on the Python bits), and seemed immediately very stable. Marije also improved the circuit that I’d been using for the vibration motors, and mocked up a final model that would be small enough to be worn around the arm (or leg) without restricting movement, and would also be light enough not to hinder performance. I’m looking forward to working with this over the next few months, as the wireless system will enable me to explore relationships between more performers/instruments.

XBee / vibro-motor / battery / Sense-Stage prototype

I would like to thank Kristina Andersen for invaluable artistic discussion and musings. Lots of food for thought concerning where my work fits in contextually, and some of the implications that pushing it in certain directions might have musically. With good reason, many people associate STEIM with sensors and technology, but it’s reassuring that the other part, which is just as important, if not more-so, is still so strongly supported. Gratitude also to Joel, Taku & Jon for further conversation, and to Andy for the fantastic meal!!

I will update once I start working with the finished design.

 

 

Soundstorming – Davide Tidoni

Relational listening and site specific interventions

d_tidoni_soundstorming02all photos by Laura Arlotti

 

Soundstorming – Amsterdam, 12-13 May 2011

Soundstorming is an exploration walk that guides participants through various acoustic territories and sound locations. The walk functions as a mobile playground for collaborative experiments with sound and listening.

Echoing the process of brainstorming, Soundstorming provides a freewheeling environment in which participants are encouraged to explore different listening modes and develop site specific interventions.

Particular attention is put on the body as a whole sensory being and political subject. Situated listening activities serve as a starting point for developing individual sensitive capacity as well as a strategy for investigating specific social-cultural contexts and notions of public and private.

At the end of the walk, participants critically presented their documentation and the experiential data gathered during the exploration with the group.

d_tidoni_soundstorming01

Key-terms, concepts and actions

Phenomenon and context > Sound is not exclusively a linear signal from source to listener. Instead of focusing on sound “in itself”, think about how the whole context of listening modifies your sensations, feelings, and place perception. Consider how site variables and conditions contribute to the holistic experience of a certain event and inform your listening experience.

Production of space > On one hand space is physical, its affordances and constraints modify your relation to it. On the other hand: each of us has the capacity to modify space just by “being there”, by triggering new events, and by making new relations possible.

Politics of listening > The position we occupy in space is a declaration of intent – a socio-cultural-political statement. Relate this to what are considered “acceptable behaviours” in public space and to the set of power relations that reside in every space. Just by adopting a certain listening posture you are questioning social conventions and cultural habits.

Borders > Borders consolidate and – at the same time – deny the contradictions and the ambiguities that they represent. On one hand, they are physical structures, they delimit specific portions of space. On the other hand they are cultural constructions that serve as an identity mirror for emphasizing – and isolating – differences. It’s only by reconstructing our relation with the space around us and by inhabiting its borders that it becomes possible to reduce and confine the violence and the power that borders represent.

d_tidoni_soundstorming5

d_tidoni_soundstorming3

References

F. Careri, Walkscapes. El andar como pràctica estética [Walkscapes: Walking as an Aesthetic Practice], Gustavo Gilí, Barcelona, 2002
G. Clement, Manifeste du Tiers-Paysage [Manifesto of the Third Landscape], Sujet/Objet, Paris, 2004
J. Crawford, Gordon Matta-Clark: In Context, in L. Fusi, M.Pierini, Gordon Matta-Clark: nulla si crea e nulla si distrugge, Silvana, Milano, 2008
W. Herzog, Vom Gehen in Eis [Of Walking In Ice], Hanser, München, 1974
D. Kleinberg-Levin, Listening as Social Practice and as a Practice of the Self, paper given at Tuned City, Tallinn, 2011
D. Michael-Levin, The Listening Self: Personal Growth, Social Change and the Closure of Metaphysics, Routledge, 1989
P. Oliveros, Deep Listening: A Composer’s Sound Practice, iUNIVERSE, New York, 2005
N. Thompson, The Interventionists: Users’ Manual for the Creative Disruption of Everyday Life, MASS MoCA & MIT Press, 2006

d_tidoni_soundstorming06

Sam Andreae, Instrument Lab

Back in April this year I attended the Instrument Lab at STEIM, this was my first visit to the institute and a welcome opportunity to focus on my electro-acoustic work. I’ve been focusing on integrating different electronic sound processes into a live Saxophone and electronics set-up with a particular focus on not actually processing the natural sound of the saxophone but rather drawing from the “non-standard” instrumental sound, blending the acoustic and electronic sounds or colliding the two aspects to generate new sounds. My current set-up is fairly simple, I use no input mixer to generate most of the electronic sounds I use and contact mics to draw from the acoustic sources (mechanical sounds, acoustic feedback, breath and the natural Saxophone sound). I like the flexibility within this simplicity though, it’s easy to add additional sound sources and when colliding the electronic and acoustic sounds within the mixer incredibly diverse results can be found.

Solo Improvisation 1 by Sam Andreae

What I was particularly keen to develop during my STEIM visit were the control aspects of this set-up. I’d already experimented with adding touch points onto the saxophone to control devices like the CrackleBox (pic below) or the Ciate-Lombarde instruments. But I wanted to take this further, increasing the integration between the physical aspects of playing the Saxophone (mechanics, movement, pressure, vibration) and selected variable aspects of the electronic sounds generated. I used a series of pedals to control many of the sounds while my hands are busy playing the Saxophone, but I wished to somehow transfer these controls onto the saxophone itself by utilizing actions that are already present when I play my instrument.

Solo Improvisation 2 by Sam Andreae

Of the many interesting lectures we attended during the course, the work on sensors and Arduino devices were the most useful for my project. Using the Arduino I could draw from any number of analogue sources and then use that information, by converting the analogue information received into resistance within an electrical circuit, to control different electronic variables. For example, using a contact mic as the analogue source, I can map the sound information received to a certain variable with my electronics (lets say amount of feedback being sent to channel 1 on the mixer) therefore allowing me to now control this electronic variable with my acoustic sound on the saxophone (play louder = more feedback). The same can be done with any number of sensors and variables within my set-up, currently I’m using pressure pads and contact mics and I’m working on using accelerometers and photo-resistors in the future.

Solo Improvisation 3 by Sam Andreae

My work has leapt forward thanks to my STEIM visit, I found it such an inspiring place to be, all the staff are incredibly dedicated to the work they do and this creates such a great atmosphere at the center. I’d particularly like to mention Jonathan who help ease us into the STEIM mentalitly, and Marije who fielded all of my idiotic Arduino questions with much patience. It was equally rewarding to be around the other participants, it turned out that we all had our focus in quite different areas, and therefore had much to learn from each other. It wasn’t all work though! Me and fellow labber Iris snuck into the synth basement one night to have a crazy jam (results below) and we all enjoyed exploring the many and internationally themed restaurants in the area (obviously we didn’t venture more than a couple of blocks from the STEIM building at ay one point).

STEIM Synth Jam (excerpts) by Sam Andreae

Lastly there was a performance at the end of the week where we all presented our work, it was great to see everyone on stage performing after all the intense discussing that had been prominent throughout the rest of the week. I don’t have any photos of my post STEIM set-up as yet, I will post again when I do. I wish all the best to everyone who attended the instrument lab and everyone who works so hard to keep STEIM such an innovative and inspiring place. I hope to visit again sometime in the future.

Solo Improvisation 5 by Sam Andreae

Sam Andreae

Truus de Groot & Elisabeth Esselink (aka SOLEX) at STEIM

Aha! Sorry for the late post! Too much creativity gets in the way sometimes – it’s all good! Solex and I started our project about 6 months ago. As we both live on different continents – I in California USA, Solex in Amsterdam – we started with a concept to create songs for kids. But we also wanted them to cross over to grown-ups. Fun for teh entire family perhaps? Also we decided on a subject, fairy tales. However, we tweaked them just a little to create a completely new story. Just an ingredient to keep it interesting and a recipe to use at possible future performances for children. As always we used plenty of unusual instrumentation. Solex is truly a marvel when it comes to loops and samples, using them in a style that is all her own. Always expect the unexpected. Can a Latin horn section really be side by side and snug as a bug in a rug with a Crackle Synthesizer? Yes most certainly.. They make lovely partners. I also utilized my very own Sonus Inflecto, my experimental synthesizer , modeled after the famous “Kraak Doos” . Our project is a perfect example how you can create amazing things in unusual settings and possibly main stream them.. As our project is near completion we both can see how this can be brought to a larger public, with all its peeps and squeaks that are so typical for experimental instruments. At this point we are trying to figure out in what format to execute it. With visuals, animation, a musical? This will take some more brainstorming.. the project gets to take a little rest now. Kristina Andersen suggested we do a test performance for kids, so we have one set on June 2nd at STEIM, from 11:00 am to 12:30 (watch for an announcement). I also got to work with the actual Crackle synthesizer and recorded plenty of loops for future use. On April 24 at a STEIM concert for ULTRA, I used them side by side. It was amazing they are like siblings, it was as if they were talking to each other.. As always it is my mission that the world remembers Michel Waisvish and his amazing talent, I hope to convey that in all of my future projects. One can say Michel opened the experimental door for me in 1979…and I never closed it since then.. We will update our blog as things happen…

COYOTE WEEK 2

Residency at STEIM (23.04 – 6.05 2012) 

Patricia Bosshard: augmented violin, conception

Dragos Tara: live electronics, conception

 

Gestures sequence definition: this sequence, mostly made out of slow and tensed motions, will be repeated, as a ritual.

Small variations depending on the evolving sound environment. Some gestures produce violin sound, some don’t. The interactions with computer don’t have to always be obvious.

The electronic sounds are made of emulation of modular synths (MAX/MSP).
In a rich multilayer sound context, the gestures isolates some sounds, acting on their volume, frequency range and spatial behavior.

Future, perspectives:
More focus on violin sound an gestures, independently from them impact on electronics.
Sound tests with more than 4 loudspeakers for sound spatialization.
Explore the performance as a whole, especially under the woman-computer dialog point of vue.